Smart Labs aren’t the future. They’re already here…
When tech doesn’t ask permission
SmartLabs are no longer a promise. They are operational, embedded, and already changing how we discover, diagnose, and deliver science. As Sarah Borg Bonnici, CEO and Co-Director at Aryium, put it:
"Technology doesn’t wait. It doesn’t pause for consensus. It integrates, while we’re still debating."
This article explores five critical factors that will determine whether SmartLabs become a true enabler of science or an expensive liability.
GxP Digitalisation: The foundation of compliance
AI-driven discovery: The risk of diconnection
Landlord readiness: Bridging spec and reality
Cybersecurity: The compliance gap no one talks about
Clinical trials infrastructure: From sites to structure
-
"That’s not transformation, it’s digital theatre."
The Need: Compliance isn’t optional. From MHRA to FDA, digital traceability is now a requirement.
The Mistake: Labs adopting out-of-the-box software without URS, CSV, or system integration.
The Consequence: Regulatory breaches, data loss, and operational risk.
The Fix:
Digitisation aligned with URS and compliance frameworks
System validation and audit trail capability
Staff trained in both software use and the regulatory context
Cloud risk mitigation for downtime, backup, and access
-
"We don’t just need better AI, we need usable AI."
The Opportunity: AI can accelerate analysis, modelling, and diagnostics.
The Flaw: AI tools are adopted in isolation from workflow or governance.
The Risk: Biased models, opaque decision-making, and untraceable results.
The Fix:
Infrastructure for auditability and reproducibility
Data governance policies for AI use
Integration into GxP workflows and regulatory review
-
"It’s not enough to say it’s digital-ready. It has to be ready."
The Trend: Labs marketed as "AI-ready" or "smart-enabled."
The Reality: Weak fibre backbones, poor cooling, and non-compliant shared infrastructure.
The Risk: Operational downtime, costly retrofits, or regulatory non-conformance.
The Fix:
Developers must understand digital tenant profiles
Lab/server hybrid functionality built into the base build
Compliance-grade BMS and IoT systems
-
"Every smart layer without cyber is a risk multiplier."
The Shift: From paper logs to remote systems, SmartLabs are growing their digital footprint.
The Blindspot: Most audits skip cybersecurity. Most SOPs ignore intrusion risk.
The Consequence: Data breaches, ransomware, reputational and scientific damage.
The Fix:
Zero-trust architecture in GxP zones
Endpoint and network segmentation
Staff cyber awareness and digital SOP updates
-
"If your lab can’t support modern trials, it’s not a SmartLab. It’s a bottleneck."
The Evolution: Decentralised trials require digital fluency across all lab functions.
The Challenge: Disconnected tools, legacy LIMS, and manual records in critical trial phases.
The Risk: Delays, data integrity issues, and loss of sponsor trust.
The Fix:
HL7/FHIR-compatible platforms
Chain-of-custody automation
Role-based cloud access for trial teams
Final thoughts: Time to catch up
Sarah recalled her father teaching her to calculate logarithms by hand, only for those tools to be replaced by calculators, then smartphones.
"That moment is happening again," she said. "If we’re still reaching for the slide rule - while everyone else is running models on a neural net - we’re not just behind, we’re irrelevant."
SmartLabs are not a hypothetical. They’re here. And they need to be:
Built for compliance
Connected by design
Protected at every layer
The ask:
Developers: Build for function, not marketing photos.
Occupiers: Demand systems that meet regulatory and operational standards.
Regulators: Close the gap between innovation and oversight.